International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research
Abbreviation: IJIASR | ISSN (Print): 2602-4810 | ISSN (Online): 2602-4535 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiasr

Review article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research 2021, Vol. 5(3) 163-174

Ethnobotanical Uses of Liliaceae s.s. and Colchicaceae Taxa in Turkey

Mustafa Eray Bozyel, Elif Merdamert-Bozyel, Atakan Benek, Dilay Turu, Mustafa Ali Yakan & Kerem Canlı

pp. 163 - 174   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasr.2021.379.4

Published online: October 11, 2021  |   Number of Views: 205  |  Number of Download: 363

Download PDF

Abstract

The relationship between plants and humans is as old as human history. The branch of science that studies this relationship between humans and plants is called ethnobotany. People have been used plants in various ways, including food, medicine, clothing, goods, and firewood. Geophyte is a name given to herbaceous plants with special subsoil stems, such as bulbs, rhizomes, and tubers. In the Flora of Turkey, monocotyl geophytes are represented by 688 species, of which 244 are endemic. The rate of endemism is 35.5%. They belong mostly to the families Liliaceae s.l., Amaryllidaceae, Iridaceae, Araceae, and Orchidaceae. There are many reports on the ethnomedicinal effects of Liliaceae s.s. and Colchicaceae families. This review reports on the findings of an ethnobotanical survey of Liliaceae and Colchicaceae families used in Turkey. As a result of the study, we listed that four Gagea, four Tulipa, three Fritillaria, and two Lilium taxa from the Liliaceae s.s., and three Colchicum taxa from the Colchicaceae were used ethnobotanically by local people in Turkey. It was also apparent from the results of the study, Liliaceae s.s. and Colchicaceae families are mostly used by local people for ornamental plant. The genus Tulipa has the greatest number of ethnobotanical uses. The most commonly used plant parts are whole plants, bulbs, and flowers.

Keywords: Liliaceae, Colchicaceae, Gagea, Tulipa, Fritillaria, Lilium, Colchicum, Ethnobotanical Uses in Turkey

How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Bozyel, M.E., Merdamert-Bozyel, E., Benek, A., Turu, D., Yakan, M.A. & Canli, K. (2021). Ethnobotanical Uses of Liliaceae s.s. and Colchicaceae Taxa in Turkey . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research, 5(3), 163-174. doi: 10.29329/ijiasr.2021.379.4

Harvard
Bozyel, M., Merdamert-Bozyel, E., Benek, A., Turu, D., Yakan, M. and Canli, K. (2021). Ethnobotanical Uses of Liliaceae s.s. and Colchicaceae Taxa in Turkey . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research, 5(3), pp. 163-174.

Chicago 16th edition
Bozyel, Mustafa Eray, Elif Merdamert-Bozyel, Atakan Benek, Dilay Turu, Mustafa Ali Yakan and Kerem Canli (2021). "Ethnobotanical Uses of Liliaceae s.s. and Colchicaceae Taxa in Turkey ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research 5 (3):163-174. doi:10.29329/ijiasr.2021.379.4.
References
  1. Akan, H., & Satil, F. (2005). Morphological and anatomical investigations on some species of Colchicum L. occurring in south east Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Biological Sciences, 5(4), 402-410. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akbulut, S., & Bayramoglu, M.M. (2013). The trade and use of some medical and aromatic herbs in Turkey. Studies on Ethno-Medicine, 7(2), 67-77. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akbulut, S., & Özkan, Z.C. (2014). Traditional usage of some wild plants in Trabzon region (Turkey). Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 135-145. [Google Scholar]
  4. Akgül, G. (2008). Çıldır (Ardahan) ve çevresinde bulunan bazı doğal bitkilerin yerel adları ve etnobotanik özellikleri. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi, 14(1), 75-88. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aktan, T. (2011). Yenişehir (Bursa) köylerinin etnobotanik özellikleri. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Celal Bayar University, Manisa. [Google Scholar]
  6. Altundağ, E. (2009). Iğdır ilinin (Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi) doğal bitkilerinin halk tarafından kullanımı. Unpublished PhD Thesis, İstanbul University, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aydın, S. (2004). Anadolu diyagonali: Ekolojik kesinti tarihsel-kültürel farklılığa işaret edebilir mi? Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri için Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17, 117-137. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bağcı, Y., Erdoğan, R., & Doğu, S. (2016). Sarıveliler (Karaman) ve çevresinde yetişen bitkilerin etnobotanik özellikleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, 42(1), 84-107. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baytop, T. (1999). Türkiye’de bitkilerle tedavi, geçmişte ve bugün. Nobel Tıp Basımevi, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bozyel, M.E, Merdamert Bozyel, E., Canlı, K., & Altuner, E.M. (2019b). Anticancer uses of medicinal plants in Turkish traditional medicine. KSU J. Agric Nat., 22(Suppl. 2), 465-484. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bozyel, M.E., & Merdamert, E. (2018). Antiurolithiatic activity of medicinal plants in Turkey. Science, Ecology and Engineering Research in the Globalizing World, 152-167. St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, Sofia. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bozyel, M.E., & Merdamert-Bozyel, E. (2020a). Ethnomedicinal uses of genus Lavandula (Lamiaceae) in Turkish traditional medicine. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research (IJAAR), 4(2), 5-16. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bozyel, M.E., & Merdamert-Bozyel, E. (2020b). Ethnomedicinal uses of Iridaceae taxa in Turkish traditional medicine. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR), 4(4), 37-41. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bozyel, M.E., Merdamert-Bozyel, E., & Canli, K. (2020a). Ethnobotanical uses of medicinal plants for the treatment of herniated disc in Turkish traditional medicine. Ethnomedicinal Plant Use and Practice in Traditional Medicine, 221-234. IGI Global. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bozyel, M.E., Merdamert-Bozyel, E., & Canli, K. (2020b). Turkish herbal medicine in the treatment of back pain. Ethnomedicinal Plant Use and Practice in Traditional Medicine, 235-251. IGI Global. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bozyel, M.E., Merdamert-Bozyel, E., Benek, A., Turu, D., Yakan, M.A., Canlı, K. (2020c). Ethnomedicinal uses of Araceae taxa in Turkish traditional medicine. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research (IJAAR), 4(5), 78-87. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bozyel, M.E., Şenturan, M., Benek, A., Merdamert Bozyel, E., Canli, K., & Altuner, E.M. (2019a). In vitro antimicrobial activity screening of Heliotropium europaeum against wide range of microorganisms and multi drug resistant (mdr) bacteria. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(3), 113-117. [Google Scholar]
  18. Brickell, C.D. (1984). Colchicum L. In: Davis PH (ed) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 8, 329-351. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bulut, G., & Tuzlacı, E. (2015). An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Bayrami̇ç. Marmara Pharmaceutical Journal, 19(3), 268-282. [Google Scholar]
  20. Canli, K., Altuner, E.M., Akata, I., Turkmen, Y., & Uzek, U. (2016a). In vitro antimicrobial screening of Lycoperdon lividum and determination of the ethanol extract composition by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology, 11(2), 389-394. [Google Scholar]
  21. Canli, K., Bozyel, M.E., & Altuner, E.M. (2017a). In vitro antimicrobial activity screening of Maclura pomifera fruits against wide range of microorganisms. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention, 6(8), 19-22. [Google Scholar]
  22. Canli, K., Simsek, O., Yetgin, A., & Altuner, E.M. (2017b). Determination of the chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Frankenia hirsuta. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology, 12(4), 463-469. [Google Scholar]
  23. Canli, K., Yetgin, A., & Altuner, E.M. (2017c). Antimicrobial activity screening of Allium tuncelianum. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 4(4), 33-36. [Google Scholar]
  24. Canlı, K., Yetgin, A., Akata, I., & Altuner, E.M. (2016a). In vitro antimicrobial activity screening of Rheum rhabarbarum roots. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention, 5(2), 1-4. [Google Scholar]
  25. Canli, K., Yetgin, A., Akata, I., & Altuner, E.M. (2016b). In vitro antimicrobial activity of Angelica sylvestris roots. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 1(1), 1-7. [Google Scholar]
  26. Canlı, K., Yetgin, A., Akata, I., & Altuner, E.M. (2016b). In vitro antimicrobial screening of Aquilaria agallocha roots. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 13(5), 178-181. [Google Scholar]
  27. Canlı, K., Yetgin, A., Akata, I., & Altuner, E.M. (2017a). Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition screening of Epilobium montanum root. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 51(3), 239-243. [Google Scholar]
  28. Canlı, K., Yetgin, A., Akata, I., & Altuner, E.M. (2017b). Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition screening of Anacyclus pyrethrum root. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 51(3), 244-248. [Google Scholar]
  29. Canli, K., Yetgin, A., Benek, A., Bozyel, M.E, & Altuner, E.M. (2019). In vitro antimicrobial activity screening of ethanol extract of Lavandula stoechas and investigation of its biochemical composition. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences, 2019, Article ID 3201458, 1-6. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cotton, C.M. (1996). Ethnobotany principles and applications. John WIiley & Sons, Chichester. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dağlı, M. (2015). Şanlıurfa merkez ve bağlı köylerde etnobotanik bir araştırma. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Harran University, Şanlıurfa. [Google Scholar]
  32. Davis, P.H. (1965). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Vol.1, Edinburgh. [Google Scholar]
  33. Davis, P.H., (1965-1985). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 1-9, Edinburgh. [Google Scholar]
  34. Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R., & Tan, K. (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement). Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 10, Edinburgh. [Google Scholar]
  35. Doğan, A. (2014). Pertek (Tunceli) yöresinde etnobotanik araştırmalar. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Marmara University, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  36. Düşen, D.O., & Sümbül, H. (2007). A morphological investigation of Colchicum L. (Liliaceae) species in the mediterranean region in Turkey. Turk J Bot, 31, 373-419. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ekim, T., Koyuncu, M., Vural, M., Duman, H., Aytaç Z., & Adıguzel, N. (2000). Türkiye bitkileri kırmızı kitabı, eğrelti ve tohumlu bitkiler. Türkiye Tabiatını Koruma Vakfı Derneği, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Press, Yayın no: 18, 1. Baskı. [Google Scholar]
  38. Emre Bulut, G. (2008). Bayramiç (Çanakkale) yöresinde etnobotanik araştırmalar. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  39. Erarslan, Z.B., Ecevit Genc, G., & Kultur, S. (2020). Medicinal plants traditionally used to treat skin diseases in Turkey–eczema, psoriasis, vitiligo. Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(1), 137-166. [Google Scholar]
  40. Erinç, S. (1969). Klimatoloji ve metodlari. İstanbul Üniversitesi Coğrafya Fakültesi Yayınları, Yayın no: 35, 2. baskı. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ertuğ, F. (2000). An ethnobotanical study in central Anatolia (Turkey). Economic Botany, 54(2), 155-182. [Google Scholar]
  42. Furkan, M. K. (2016). Adıyaman ilinde yetişen bazı bitkilerin etnobotanik özellikleri. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Adıyaman University, Adıyaman. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gelse, A. (2012). Adıyaman ve çevresinin etnobotanik özellikleri. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gençay, A. (2007). Cizre (Şırnak)’nin etnobotanik özellikleri. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van. [Google Scholar]
  45. Güldaş, N. (2009). Adıyaman ilinde etnobotanik değeri olan bazı bitkilerin kullanım alanlarının tespiti. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Fırat University, Elazığ. [Google Scholar]
  46. Güner, A., Aslan, S., Ekim, T., Vural, M., & Babaç, M.T. (eds.). (2012). Türkiye bitkileri listesi (damarlı bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  47. Güner, A., Özhatay, N., Ekim, T., & Başer, K.H.C. (2000). The Flora of Turkey and the east aegean islands (Supplement II). Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 11, Edinburg. [Google Scholar]
  48. Güneş, F., & Özhatay, N. (2011). An ethnobotanical study from Kars (eastern) Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 4(1), 30-41. [Google Scholar]
  49. Güneş, S., Savran, A., Paksoy, M.Y., Koşar, M., & Çakılcıoğlu, U. (2017). Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants in Karaisalı and its surrounding (Adana-Turkey). Journal of Herbal Medicine, 8, 68-75. [Google Scholar]
  50. Güzel, Y., & Güzelşemme, M. (2018). Wild plants used as herbal tea in Antakya and Defne provinces of Hatay. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(1), 1-5. [Google Scholar]
  51. Güzel, Y., Güzelşemme, M., & Miski, M. (2015). Ethnobotany of medicinal plants used in Antakya: a multicultural district in Hatay Province of Turkey. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 174, 118-152. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jitin, R. (2013). An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Taindol village, district Jhansi, region of Bundelkhand, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies, 1, (5), 59-71. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kahraman, A., & Celep, F. (2010). Anatomical properties of Colchicum kurdicum (Bornm.) Stef. (Colchicaceae). AJCS, 4(5), 369-371. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaval, I. (2011). Geçitli (Hakkari) ve çevresi'nin etnobotanik özellikleri. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kendir, G., & Güvenç, A. (2010). Etnobotanik ve Türkiye’de yapılmış etnobotanik çalışmalara genel bir bakış. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 49-80. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kökçü, B., Esen, O., & Uysal, İ. (2015). Medicinal plants sold in Çanakkale/Turkey city center herbalists. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 8(3), 80-91. [Google Scholar]
  57. Korkmaz, M., & Alparslan, Z. (2015). Ergan dağı (Erzincan-Türkiye)’nın etnobotanik özellikleri. Bağbahçe Bilim Dergisi, 1(3), 1-31. [Google Scholar]
  58. Korkut, M.M. (2006). Arat Dağı (Şanlıurfa) Florası ve Etnobotanik Özellikleri. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Harran University, Şanlıurfa. [Google Scholar]
  59. Metin, A. (2009). Mut ve çevresinde (Mersin) yetişen bitkilerin etnobotanik özellikleri. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Selçuk University, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mükemre, M., Behçet, L., & Çakılcıoğlu, U. (2015). Ethnobotanical study on medicinal plants in villages of Çatak (Van-Turkey). Journal of ethnopharmacology, 166, 361-374. [Google Scholar]
  61. Nadiroğlu, M., Behçet, L., & Çakılcıoğlu, U. (2019). An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in Karlıova (Bingöl-Turkey). Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 18(1), 76-87. [Google Scholar]
  62. Nordenstam, B. (1998). Colchicaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 3. Flowering plants: Monocotyledons, Lilianae (except Orchidaceae). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 175-185. [Google Scholar]
  63. Özaktan, G. (2009). Kızılcahamam İlçesi Halk İlaçları. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  64. Özdemir Nath, E., & Kültür, Ş. (2017). The local names of the plants in Kepsut and Savaştepe (Balıkesir, Turkey). İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, 47(1), 12-23. [Google Scholar]
  65. Özhatay, N. (2002). Diversity of bulbous monocots in Turkey with special reference. Chromosome numbers. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 74(4), 547-555. [Google Scholar]
  66. Özhatay, N., & Kültür, Ş. (2006). Check-list of additional taxa to the supplement flora of Turkey III. Turkish Journal of Botany, 30(4), 281-316. [Google Scholar]
  67. Özhatay, N., Akalın, E., Genç G., & Kültür, Ş. (2009). Ethnomedicinal uses of the wild vascular plants from European Turkey (Turkish Thrace). Proceeding of the Fourth Balkan Botanical Congress, Scientific Area Ethnobotany and Phytochemistry, 613-623. Sofia, Bulgaria. [Google Scholar]
  68. Özhatay, N., Kültür, Ş., & Aksoy, N. (1994). Check-list of additional taxa to the supplement flora of Turkey I. Turkish Journal of Botany, 18(6), 497-514. [Google Scholar]
  69. Özhatay, N., Kültür, Ş., & Aksoy, N. (1999). Check-list of additional taxa to the supplement FLORA of Turkey II. Turkish Journal of Botany, 23(3), 151-169. [Google Scholar]
  70. Özhatay, N., Kültür, Ş., & Gürdal, B. (2015). Check-list of additional taxa to the supplement flora of Turkey VII. Journal of Faculty Pharmacy of Istanbul University 45(1), 61–86. [Google Scholar]
  71. Persson, K. (1993). Reproductive strategies and evolution in Colchicum. Proceedings of the 5th Optima meeting, Istanbul University, Istanbul, 394–414. [Google Scholar]
  72. Persson, K. (2000). Colchicum L., In Güner A, Ozhatay N, Ekim T, Baser KHC (ed) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement II), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, Vol. 11, 246-265. [Google Scholar]
  73. Persson, K. (2005). A new Turkish species of Colchicum (Colchicaceae) related to [Google Scholar]
  74. C. boissieri. Edinburgh Journal of Botany, 62(3), 181–192. [Google Scholar]
  75. Persson, K. (2007). Nomenclatural synopsis of the Genus Colchicum (Colchicaceae), [Google Scholar]
  76. with some new species and combinations. Bot Jahrb Syst, 127(2), 165-242. [Google Scholar]
  77. Polat, R. (2010). Havran ve Burhaniye (Balıkesir) çevresinde tarımsal biyoçeşitlilik ve etnobotanik araştırmaları. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir. [Google Scholar]
  78. Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography; being the collected papers of C. Raunkiaer. Clarendon. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sadıkoğlu, N., & Alpınar, K. (2004). An evaluation of Turkish ethnobotanical studies (1928-1997). İstanbul Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi, 37, 61-66. [Google Scholar]
  80. Saraç, D.U., Özkan, Z.C., & Akbulut, S. (2013). Ethnobotanic features of Rize/Turkey province. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 6(3), 57-66. [Google Scholar]
  81. Satıl, F., Akçiçek, E., & Selvi, S. (2008). Madra dağı (Balıkesir/İzmir) ve çevresinde etnobotanik bir çalışma. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 1(1), 31-36. [Google Scholar]
  82. Simpson, M.G. (2006). Plant systematics. Elsevier, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  83. Takhtajan, A. (2008). Flowering Plants. Springer Science and Business Media B.W. [Google Scholar]
  84. Tamura, M.N. (1998). Liliaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 3. Flowering plants: Monocotyledons, Lilianae (except Orchidaceae). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 343-353. [Google Scholar]
  85. Tekin, S. (2011). Üzümlü (Erzincan) ilçesinin etnobotanik özellikleri. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan. [Google Scholar]
  86. Tütenocaklı, T. (2014). Yenice (Çanakkale) ve çevresinde tarımsal bitki biyoçeşitliliği ve etnobotanik araştırmalar. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale. [Google Scholar]
  87. Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., & Webb, D.A., 1968-1980. Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Vol. 2-5, New York. [Google Scholar]
  88. Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M, & Webb, D.A. (1964). Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, New York. [Google Scholar]
  89. Ugulu, I. (2011). Traditional ethnobotanical knowledge about medicinal plants used for external therapies in Alasehir, Turkey. Int. J. Med. Arom. Plants, 1(2), 101-106. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ugulu, I., Baslar, S., Yorek, N., & Dogan, Y. (2009). The investigation and quantitative ethnobotanical evaluation of medicinal plants used around Izmir province, Turkey. Journal of Medicinal plants research, 3(5), 345-367. [Google Scholar]
  91. Ugurlu, E., & Secmen, O. (2008). Medicinal plants popularly used in the villages of Yunt Mountain (Manisa-Turkey). Fitoterapia, 79(2), 126-131. [Google Scholar]
  92. Uysal, I., Gücel, S., Tütenocakli, T., & Öztürk, M. (2012). Studies on the medicinal plants of Ayvacik-Çanakkale in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44, 239-244. [Google Scholar]
  93. Uysal, İ., Onar, S., Karabacak, E., & Çelik, S. (2010). Ethnobotanical aspects of Kapıdağ peninsula (Turkey). Biological Diversity and Conservation, 3(3), 15-22. [Google Scholar]
  94. Vinnersten, A., & Larsson, S. (2010). Colchicine is still a chemical marker for the expanded Colchicaceae. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 38, 1193–1198. [Google Scholar]
  95. Vinnersten, A., & Reeves, G. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships within Colchicaceae. American Journal of Botany, 90(10), 1455–1462. [Google Scholar]
  96. WCVP (2021). World Checklist of Vascular Plants, version 2.0. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet; http://wcvp.science.kew.org Retrieved 28 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  97. Yaşar, H.İ., Koyuncu, O., Koyuncu, F.T., & Kuş, G. (2019). Sale of medicinal and aromatic plants and economic dimensions in Eskişehir herbalist. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 12(2), 25-28. [Google Scholar]
  98. Yeşil, Y. (2007). Kürecik (Akçadağ/Malatya) bucağında etnobotanik bir araştırma. Unpublished MSc Thesis, İstanbul University, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  99. Yetgin, A., Canlı, K., & Altuner, E.M. (2018). Comparison of antimicrobial activity of Allium sativum cloves from China and Taşköprü, Turkey. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences, 2018. Article ID 9302840, 1-5. [Google Scholar]
  100. Yıldırımlı, Ş. (2004). Etnobotanik ve Türk etnobotaniği. Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri için Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17, 175-195. [Google Scholar]
  101. Yücel, E., Şengün, İ.Y., & Çoban, Z. (2008). The wild plants consumed as a food in Afyonkarahisar/Turkey and consumption forms of these plants. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 5(2), 95-105. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 5 (3)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 5 Issue 3

September 2021

All Articles
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research.
Pen Academic Publishing is a trademark of THDSoft.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC-ND
Electronic Journal Management System. This software was developed in Türkiye. ejournal.gen.tr
Pen Academic Publishing General Publication Policy: