International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research
Abbreviation: IJIASR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4535 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiasr

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research 2025, Vol. 9(4) 86-97

Effects of Cutting Management on the Feed Quality of Triticale Grain

Fırat Alatürk, Ahmet Gökkuş

pp. 86 - 97   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasr.2025.1386.2

Publish Date: December 31, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0


Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of cutting management practices on the grain characteristics and feeding quality of triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack). The research was conducted over two consecutive years (2014–2016) at the Research and Application Field of the Faculty of Agriculture, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Dardanos Campus, using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Five stubble heights (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 cm) and five cutting frequencies (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 times) were evaluated. Grain samples were analyzed for crude protein, crude ash, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), digestible organic matter (DOM), metabolizable energy (ME), digestible energy (DE), and net energy (NE). Increasing cutting frequency and stubble height resulted in significant reductions in grain crude protein and energy contents. The highest crude protein (12.4%), digestible organic matter (84.6%), metabolizable energy (2.43 Mcal/kg DM), and net energy (1.46 Mcal/kg DM) values were obtained from the treatment cut once with a 5 cm stubble height. Conversely, higher cutting frequencies increased NDF and ADF contents, leading to lower overall feed quality. It is concluded that a single cutting at a low stubble height (5–7.5 cm) represents the most suitable management practice for maintaining the feeding quality of triticale grain. This management approach helps preserve the nutritional composition and sustain high energy values essential for animal feeding.

Keywords: Triticale, Stubble Height, Cutting Frequency, Crude Protein, Neutral Detergent Fiber, Energy Value, Feed Quality


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Alaturk, F., & Gokkus, A. (2025). Effects of Cutting Management on the Feed Quality of Triticale Grain. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research, 9(4), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasr.2025.1386.2

Harvard
Alaturk, F. and Gokkus, A. (2025). Effects of Cutting Management on the Feed Quality of Triticale Grain. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research, 9(4), pp. 86-97.

Chicago 16th edition
Alaturk, Firat and Ahmet Gokkus (2025). "Effects of Cutting Management on the Feed Quality of Triticale Grain". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research 9 (4):86-97. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasr.2025.1386.2

References
  1. Adams, R. S. (1994). Total digestible nutrients of feeds for dairy cattle. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, Cooperative Extension, DAS 94–25. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akgün, İ., & Kara, B. (2002). Adaptation and yield performances of triticale cultivars under different ecological conditions in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 7(1), 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  3. Albayrak, S., Türk, M., & Yüksel, O. (2006). Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of triticale varieties. Journal of Agronomy, 5(1), 90–93. [Google Scholar]
  4. AOAC. (1990). Official methods of analysis (15th ed.). Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherney, J. H., & Marten, G. C. (1982). Small grain crop forage potential: Evaluation of biological and chemical components. Agronomy Journal, 74(6), 899–905. [Google Scholar]
  6. Coşkun, Ş. E., Gökkuş, A., & Kaya, A. (2014). Changes in forage yield and quality of small cereals under different cutting stages in Mediterranean climate. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(2), 245–252. [Google Scholar]
  7. Droushiotis, D. N. (1989). Triticale: A new cereal for forage and grain production under Mediterranean conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 112(2), 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fonnesbeck, P. V., Harris, L. E., & Kearl, L. C. (1984). Energy requirements of livestock. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gökkuş A., Birer S., Alatürk F., 2017. Farklı anız yükseklikleri kalacak şekilde yapılan biçimlerin arpanın ot verimi ve kalitesine etkileri. Türkiye 12. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 12-15 Eylül 2017, Kahramanmaraş. [Google Scholar]
  10. Haddi, M. L., Bouzerzour, H., & Ounane, S. M. (2003). Forage yield and quality of barley and triticale as influenced by cutting stage in semi-arid regions. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, 45, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  11. Henning, J. C., Stringer, W. C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Grazing management of small grains for forage and grain. Clemson, SC: Clemson University Cooperative Extension Circular 787. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kamstra, L. D., Krysl, L. J., & Buehler, M. B. (1968). Changes in forage composition and digestibility during the growing season. Journal of Range Management, 21(1), 21–24. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaya, A. (2008). Yem bitkilerinde büyüme dönemi ve biçim zamanının kalite üzerine etkileri. Ankara, Türkiye: Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  14. Khorasani, G. R., Kennelly, J. J., & Racz, V. J. (1997). Effect of maturity on the nutritive value of cereal grains and their forages for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 64(1), 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller, D. A. (1984). Forage crops. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  16. Oddy, V. H., Robards, G. E., & Low, S. G. (1983). Prediction of in vivo dry matter digestibility from fiber analysis of forage crops. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 9(3), 237–243. [Google Scholar]
  17. Özkan, U., Yılmaz, D. İ., Tenikecier, H. S., & Ateş, E. (2025). Türkiye’de kaba yem ve kuru ot durumu: 2004–2024 dönem analizi. Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi (ETHABD), 8(1), 93–107. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pieper, R. D., Parker, E. E., & Donart, G. B. (1974). Effects of deferred grazing on herbage composition. Journal of Range Management, 27(3), 204–207. [Google Scholar]
  19. TÜİK. (2024). Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri, 2024. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. [Google Scholar]
  20. Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2008). Plant physiology (5th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tan, M. (1995). The performance of triticale cultivars and lines for forage and grain yield in eastern Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 19(4), 297–303. [Google Scholar]
  22. Towne, G., & Ohlenbusch, P. D. (1992). Vegetation response to grazing management on tallgrass prairie. Journal of Range Management, 45(2), 118–122. [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583–3597. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yanbeyi, A., & Sezer, İ. (2006). Adaptation of triticale varieties under Marmara region conditions. Journal of Tekirdağ Agricultural Faculty, 3(2), 163–168. [Google Scholar]