Pen Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 2602-4810   |  e-ISSN: 2602-4535

Original article | International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research 2020, Vol. 4(3) 66-83

Dose Optimization of Electron Arc Treatment Technique in Chest Wall Beams after Mastectomy

Nural Öztürk

pp. 66 - 83   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasr.2020.273.2   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2008-24-0001.R1

Published online: September 29, 2020  |   Number of Views: 4  |  Number of Download: 35


Abstract

In breast cancer, electron energies are preferred over photon energies because they provide minimal lung exposure when conditions allow for thin chest wall irradiation after mastectomy. In patients with irregular chest wall, it is difficult to perform a homogeneous irradiation with fixed electron beam therapy due to reasons such as thickness differences, irregular contour and lack of tissue, long scar and area joint problems. Electron arc therapy is propose as an alternative method in such patients.

The study was carried out with electron energies of 6, 9, 12, 13.5 and 16 MeV. First, in order to be able to use it in electron arc planning in the planning system, after determining the dose characteristics of all available electron energies of the electron arc technique, the accuracy of these dose distributions was verified with film and TLD dosimetry. After the suitability was determined, electron arc plans were made on the CT simulation image of 20 patients selected due to the difficulty of homogeneous irradiation with the classical method.

While the chosen reference dose of 85% covered the PTV homogeneously, it was found that the dose was decreased by an average of 50% compared to photon and classical electron therapy in the examination performed in terms of radiation dose to which the lung volume was exposed. During the planning, a homogeneous dose and bolus of different thicknesses were required depending on the energy in most patients to regulate the reduction in surface dose depending on the arc angle. Bolus prevents the lung and heart from overdosing while ensuring that the dose in the deeper parts of the target volume is more uniform. The use of tertiary block in electron-arc dose distributions prevented unwanted dose reduction in the field edges and provided a more homogeneous dose distribution at 85% reference isodose. If the structure of the patient's contour is very irregular, the dose distribution is not smooth due to the depth difference.

In this context, it has been determined that during optimization, the isocenter depth should be chosen for the homogeneity of the dose distribution and to be as equal as possible from the surface at all beam angles. In addition, in the study, it was determined that more appropriate dose distributions were obtaine when the isocenter depth is greater than the maximum reach of electrons. Even if multiple electron fields of different energies are used, more homogeneous dose distributions have been achieve by eliminating field combination problems with the use of electron arc therapy.

Keywords: Breast cancer, treatment with electron beams, Electron, electron arc, chest wall, dose optimization


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Ozturk, N. (2020). Dose Optimization of Electron Arc Treatment Technique in Chest Wall Beams after Mastectomy . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research, 4(3), 66-83. doi: 10.29329/ijiasr.2020.273.2

Harvard
Ozturk, N. (2020). Dose Optimization of Electron Arc Treatment Technique in Chest Wall Beams after Mastectomy . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research, 4(3), pp. 66-83.

Chicago 16th edition
Ozturk, Nural (2020). "Dose Optimization of Electron Arc Treatment Technique in Chest Wall Beams after Mastectomy ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Science Research 4 (3):66-83. doi:10.29329/ijiasr.2020.273.2.

References
  1. AAPM Report 13 (1984). American Association of Physicists in Medicine “Physical aspects of quality assurance in radiation therapy”.  [Google Scholar]
  2. Antolak J. A, El-Khatib E., Scrimger J.W. (1993). Verification of a two-dimensional pencil-beam arc-electron dose calculation algorithm: Med. Phys. 20(6), 1735-1742. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aslay I., Kemikler G. (1997).Meme kanseri radyoterapi tekniğinin gelişimi.In: Meme kanseri, Biyoloji, Tanı, Evreleme, Tedavi, İ.Ü.Onkoloji Ens.Yayınları (3), 328-329. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackburn B.E. (1981).  A practical system for elctron arc therapy: Proceedings of the symposium on electron dosimetry and arc therapy, 295-314 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyer A.L, Fullerton G.D., Mira J.G. (1982). An electron beam pseudoarc-technique for irradiation of large areas of chest wall and other curved surfaces: Int.J. Radiat. Oncol.Biol.Phys. (8).1969-1974. [Google Scholar]
  6. El-Khatib E., Antolak J., Scrimger J. (1992). Radiation dose distribution for electron arc therapy using electrons of 6-20 MeV: Phys. Med. Biol., Vol.37 (6), 1375-1384. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerbi BJ, Antolak JA, Deibel FC, et al. (2009). Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25. Med Phys.36 (7):3239–3279. [Google Scholar]
  8. GE-Medical Systems: Physics Manuel 2150584-100 (1996): Target 2, Target series 2, V1.1.0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hogstrom H. R., Kurup R.G., Shiu A.S., Starkschall G. (1989). A two- dimensional pencil-beam algorithm for calculation of arc-electron dose distributions: Phys. Med. Biol., Vol.34 (3), 315-34. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hogstrom K. R., Leavitt D.D (1986). Dosimetry of arc electron therapy. In: Radiation Onkology Physics, AAPM (15), 265-295. [Google Scholar]
  11. ICRU Report24 (1976) “International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements: Determination of absorbe dose in patients irradiated by beams of X - or gamma ray in radiotherapy procedures”  [Google Scholar]
  12. Khan F. M., Fullerton G.D., Joseph M., Lee F., Moore V. C.(1977)  Levitt S.H.(1977) Physical aspects of electron-beam arc therapy:, Radiology 124:497-500. [Google Scholar]
  13. Khan F. M. (1981) Calibration and treatment planning of electron beam arc therapy: Proceedings of the symposium on electron dosimetry and arc therapy, 249-266. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leavitt D.D., Stewart J.R. (1993) Electron arc therapy of the postmastectomy prosthetic breast: Int.J.Radiat.Oncol.Biol.Phys. (28), 297-301, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  15. Leavitt D.D., Peacock L.M., Gibbs F.A.Jr., Stewart J.R. (1985).Electron arc therapy; Physical measurement and treatment planning techniques: Int.J.Radiat.Oncol. Biol.Phys. (11), 987-999. [Google Scholar]
  16. Leavitt D. D., Stewart J.R., Moeller J.H.and Earley L. (1989). Optimization of electron-arc therapy doses by multi-vane collimator control: Int.J.Radiat.Oncol.Biol. Phys. 16(5), 489 - 496 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mc Neely.L.K., Leavitt D.D., Egger M.J., Stewart J.R. (1991) Dose volume histogram analysis of lung radiation from chest wall treatment: Comparison of electron arc and tangential photon beam techniques: Int .J. Radiat. Oncol.Biol.Phys. (21), 515-520. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mc Neely L.K., Jacobson G.M., Leavitt D.D., Stewart J.R. (1988) Electron arc therapy: chest wall irradiation of breast cancer patients: Int.J.Radiat.Oncol. Biol.Phys. (14), 1287-1294. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mc Kenzie M.R., Freeman C.R., Pla M., Guerra J., Savhami L., Pla C.and Podgorsak E.B. (1993). Clinical experience with electron pseudoarc therapy: The British Journal of Radiology (66), 234 – 240. [Google Scholar]
  20. Orr J.(1981). Mould room aids for electron arc therapy and quality assuranc in the treatment planning: Proceedings of the symposium on electron dosimetry and arc therapy, 341-344. [Google Scholar]
  21. Peacock L. M., Leavitt D.D., Gibbs F. A., Steward J.R. (1984). Electron arc therapy: Clinical experience with chest wall irradiation: Int.J.Radiat.Oncol.Biol.Phys. (10), 2149-2153. [Google Scholar]
  22. Perez C.A.,Garia D.M.,Kuska R.R.,Levilt S.H.(1994) .Breast.Stage T1 and T2 tumors:In: Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology, Perez C.A.,Brady L.W.(eds): Second Edition,Chapter 10,250,J.B.Lippincott Company-Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pla M., Pla C., Podgorsak E. B.(1988).The influence of beam parameters on percentage depth dose in electron arc therapy : Med.Phy.15(1), 49-55. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pla M., Podgorsak E.B, Pla .C. (1989). Electron dose rate and photon contamination in electron arc therapy: Med. Phys., 16(5), 692-697. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruegsegger D.R., Lerude S.D., Lyle D. (1979). Electron-beam arc therapy using a high-energy betatron: Radiology 133,483-489. [Google Scholar]
  26. Subramania J., Lawrenc H.L. (1996) Electron arc therapy in clinical radiotherapy physics, treatment planning and radiation safety Volume II (16), 77-79, CRP Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Thomadsen B. (1981).Tertiart collimation of moving electron beams: proceedings of the symposium on electron dosimetry and arc therapy, 315-326 [Google Scholar]
  28. Yazıcı O, Özdemir N.(2018) .Epidemiological Data, Risk Factors, Risk Reducing Approaches in Breast Cancer Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Oncol-Special Topics;11(1):1-7. [Google Scholar]